Talent Identification & Development Through the Female Lens
What does it mean for talent development in football when the brain is still maturing well beyond childhood?
That question matters more than the women's game has yet fully acknowledged. For a long time, it was assumed that the brain was more or less fully developed by the end of childhood. Today, we know that is not the case — and through the female lens, those implications take on an additional layer of depth and complexity.
Talent development in women's football is not only about what a player can do today. It is about understanding what she is still becoming — and building the kind of environment that protects and accelerates that process.Mirelle van Rijbroek · 2026
Research over the past decades has shown that brain development continues much longer than we once assumed — throughout adolescence and into early adulthood. Different systems develop at different speeds. Some mature relatively early. Others, especially those related to planning, impulse control, weighing consequences, emotional regulation, self-evaluation, and long-term decision-making, continue to develop well into adolescence and beyond the age of 20.
"Football asks a player to scan, recognise cues, regulate emotion under pressure, and connect her action to the wider team intention. These rely on systems still maturing well into her twenties."
Football does not only ask a player to execute technical actions such as receiving, passing, dribbling, or 1v1 actions. It asks her to do this in the constantly changing context of the game. She must scan, recognise cues, interpret what the moment demands, anticipate teammates and opponents, regulate emotion under pressure, recover from mistakes, and connect her action to the wider team intention.
These are not simple demands. They rely heavily on systems of the brain that are still maturing throughout the teenage years and often into early adulthood. That means a talented young female player may still be developing in areas such as:
These should not be seen as signs of lower quality or lower potential. They are a normal part of development. If coaches, scouts, or clubs do not understand this, they risk misreading normal developmental variability as a lack of football intelligence, mentality, discipline, or potential. In the women's game, where pathways are still narrower and second chances are often fewer, that kind of misreading can be especially costly.
In football, brain maturation cannot be separated from puberty. Puberty in girls generally begins earlier than in boys, but its timing and impact vary enormously from player to player. Some female players begin this process very early. Others much later. This means that within one age group, players of the same chronological age can be in very different biological, emotional, and neurological stages of development — and yet they are often coached, compared, and selected as if they are equivalent.
That is where many misunderstandings begin.
During puberty, hormonal shifts influence far more than the body alone. They can affect mood, energy, emotional regulation, concentration, body awareness, and how a player experiences herself from week to week. At the same time, the brain systems needed to organise, regulate, interpret, and adapt are still developing. The body is changing, the brain is changing, and the player's sense of self is changing — all at once.
Growth spurts can temporarily disrupt timing, balance, coordination, and movement efficiency. Changes in body shape or composition can alter how a player experiences speed, contact, turning, jumping, or striking the ball. At the same time, increased self-consciousness can affect how freely she expresses herself in the game. These changes are real. They are normal. And they are often poorly understood in football environments.
Variability during puberty is not a signal of low potential. It is often a signal of development in progress.
A key part of this conversation is the prefrontal cortex — the area of the brain that plays a major role in planning, thinking ahead, impulse control, evaluating decisions, understanding consequences, emotional regulation, and adapting behaviour. In football language, it is active when a player reflects on a decision, adapts her behaviour after a mistake, manages frustration, stays composed under pressure, interprets feedback, and links game experience to future action.
The prefrontal cortex does not mature quickly. It develops gradually over many years and needs repeated experience, appropriate challenge, guidance, and support from the environment to strengthen over time.
A young female player who feels safe, trusted, and supported is more likely to remain cognitively open. She is more likely to try again, take initiative, stay engaged after mistakes, and continue to search for solutions. A player who feels watched, judged, or uncertain can narrow. Her decision-making may become safer. Her scanning may reduce. Her willingness to try may disappear.
This is why confidence and development are connected — they are not separate threads.
One of the biggest mistakes in talent development is to treat confidence, hesitation, or fear of failure as if they are simply personality traits. Often they are not. What looks like a lack of courage or mentality may actually be a developmental and neurological response to the environment.
When a young female player is afraid of making mistakes, or senses that her role or coach's trust depends on looking right rather than learning, the brain shifts into protection mode. Attention narrows. Initiative drops. Risk-taking decreases. The player becomes more careful, more reactive, and less expressive. From the outside, this may look like passivity, low intensity, poor body language, or reduced competitive drive — but often it is the behaviour of a player who is trying not to get hurt by the environment.
This matters especially in women's football because many female players arrive in performance environments already shaped by broader social messages: do not be wrong, do not stand out too much, do not take up too much space.
Before deciding that a player lacks bravery or mentality, a better question is: What has the environment taught her is safe?
Has she truly been given room to try, fail, reflect, and try again?
Or has she learned that visibility is risky and safety is rewarded?
That is not a small question. It sits at the centre of female player development.
A further implication of later brain development is that many adolescent female players are still not fully equipped to independently manage all the demands placed on them.
Planning ahead, managing competing demands, regulating emotion under pressure, understanding long-term consequences, and genuinely reflecting on one's own development are all sophisticated functions. These capacities are still being built. When adults expect a 14-, 15-, or 16-year-old female player to fully self-manage her development and process feedback with adult depth, they may be asking for something developmentally premature.
"That is not empowering. It is often too much, too early."
Young female players still need structure, guidance, consistent language, support in reflection, and help making sense of their experiences. The goal is gradual ownership. The coach's role is not to do the thinking for the player forever. It is to walk alongside her while those capacities are still being built.
A player may give thoughtful or composed answers in a review conversation — she may know the "correct" response and sound reflective. But the depth of genuine self-understanding behind those words can vary enormously at this age. Many female players are socially attuned and good at reading adults. They may tell the coach what they think the coach wants to hear. That should not be mistaken for deep reflection.
Better conversations are slower, more curious, and more relational. They ask:
What did you really experience there?
What felt difficult?
What changed for you in that phase?
What did you notice in yourself?
What do you think helped you?
What do you still not fully understand yet?
Those kinds of conversations support real learning. And real learning, over time, supports more self-aware and resilient players.
If brain development continues longer than we once thought, and if puberty, confidence, identity, and environment all interact with learning, then coaching cannot only be about instruction and correction. It must also be about timing, understanding, and environment.
Good coaching in this phase is not softer coaching. It is more intentional, more informed, and more accurate coaching.
The later development of the brain asks everyone in women's football to rethink some of the assumptions built into how we see, evaluate, and support young female players.
A player may appear inconsistent during puberty while actually moving through a completely normal period of neurological, hormonal, and personal transition. She may look passive or cautious on the pitch while actually responding, quite rationally, to an environment that has not yet made it safe enough to learn boldly.
None of this lowers the standards we hold for young female players. It improves the way we read them.
Because talent development in women's football is not only about what a player can do today. It is about understanding what she is still becoming, how she is developing her potential, and building the kind of environment that protects, supports, and accelerates that process rather than cutting it short.
This article is part of a six-part series exploring talent development in football through the female lens. The series is inspired by the work of Professor Jelle Jolles and builds on earlier work developed together with Annemarie van der Eem, in which insights from brain development, learning, and environment were connected to the development of young people.
Mirelle van Rijbroek | 2026